Filipino populists are weak leaders

Analysis and Opinion

By Joe America

The Philippines is run by populists. The Senate is full of them. The President is one, a haunt of history elected by hook or crook. The former President is also one, “just one of us, rough and ready”. Even the House reps are populists, locally. Dynastic barons who easily pull in votes from the fawning locals who don’t know any different.

The problem with populists is that they are not business executives, or anything close. They are popular because they are good at currying favor from the powerful. Not running a great nation to benefit its citizens. Entitlement. Impunity. Rewards. Riches. These are the values of populists. Not achievement, productivity, or even fairness. Or honesty.

Color me out of step because I don’t like populists. I like capitalist sharks who are tough but honest. Wealth producers. Competitors. Innovators. Decisive bosses. I like them.

I like people who are conceptual, strategic, tactical, movers, shakers and impatient with fools.

The Philippines has these people. They are the oligarchs who crank out growth and profits with unabated enthusiasm. But they stay out of the political world. It’s dirty. And unprofitable unless you are corrupt. Are the oligarchs Philippine patriots? I don’t know. I have a hard time exclaiming “yes!” because I don’t think it matters to them what the politicians are doing. I don’t see nationalists in the business arena. I see capitalists.

The most successful business people with government jobs are the Villars. Father. Wife. Son. They seem to use their political jobs to write laws that favor their business interests. That’s not nationalism in my book. It’s capitalism with an advantage.

One is inclined to wonder who in government is for the nation? Populists are for themselves. Business people are for themselves. Dynasts are for themselves. Citizens are just the poor schmucks who are used, abused, and tossed aside. It’s why the Philippines has a notoriously poor record in global rankings for labor well-being. Bottom ten!!!

Well, my job here is not to wail and weep. It’s to describe the scene and figure out who might be able to break out of this greedy morass of incompetent populist despair and put the nation on a saner footing. A productive footing. A wealthy footing that does much better at taking care of workers.

This person must be smart and dedicated. Determined. Capable in the style of a business shark. Leni Robredo seems to be smart, but is not a shark. I look around and only one person catches my eye.

Gilbert Teodoro, Secretary of Defense. Lawyer. Politician. Businessman.

There are those who say, but yeah, he was with that corrupt President Arroyo and lost some rubber boats. And was going to run as VP to Sara Duterte until she conceded to Marcos and went for VP herself. And I say, yes, that is the school of hard knocks that shapes leaders. If you are looking for a perfection, you are just another populist. You are a part of the problem.

His credentials include:

  • Brains, bar top-notcher
  • Aggressive Western mindset, read his pronouncements on China’s actions
  • Close to the US, full speed ahead on EDCA and building defense
  • Experienced in government, under Arroyo and now Marcos
  • Business acumen, sits on boards of prominent companies
  • Has integrity, lost to Aquino because he refused to do dirty politics
  • He is for the Philippines, he could be anywhere else, making money

Instead, he’s the Secretary of Defense. At a very difficult time.

You’d prefer Duterte or Tulfo? You’d prefer Robredo? You’d prefer Hontiveros?

Okay, tell me how they are better than Secretary Teodoro.

___________________

Photo from Binar News, Indonesia, May 14, 2019. Current Senators Dela Rosa and Go then featured on President Duterte’s list of favored senatorial candidates.

 

Comments
52 Responses to “Filipino populists are weak leaders”
  1. I remember the feeling then failure of Mar and failure of Gibo. By not wanting photo ops the narrative was written for them not by them. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/specialreports/190321/gibo-teodoro-wages-lonely-battle-to-win-malaca-ang/story/

    • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

      It dawns on me from a comment on another thread that winners in politics HAVE to be populists, or have populist “skills”, and it’s the lack of dedication to having those skills that produces loss after loss.

      • LCPL_X's avatar LCPL_X says:

        all elections are popularity contests. so if you wanna get elected you have to be a populist first and foremost. then once elected get things done. just watching youtube videos of him , he seems too polished, Joe. maybe if he went to the South China sea and get himself video’d pissing on a Chinese vessel or better yet a Chinese naval officer. that would do it. i think.

        • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

          Yes, populism is a skill Democrats, yellows, and pinks need to perfect. That “too polished” assessment reminds me of Filipino attitudes toward success. Successful people are disliked because they “are trying to show my failed ass up”. The Philippines needs polished people. Lee Kuan Yew was polished. Leni Robredo is polished. But Sec. Teodoro is also a shark. He speaks directly. No one intimidates him.

          • LCPL_X's avatar LCPL_X says:

            actually, Joe, and chempo can correct me here, LKY was gangsta as fuck thus widely respected. its not really about success i don’t think, Joe, just the ability to have that common touch is respected. in the end that’s what people respect, you can be successful but if you have that common touch and not parade dogs as people and such, then you’re on that right path. once you parade pet dogs like that corgi and communist dumbass, people puke in their mouths. its as simple as that. like when Bush Sr. pretended to do groceries and it became evident he never does groceries or when Hillary went on a black talk show podcast and took out a hot sauce bottle from her purse. just obvious pandering. people like successful people who keepz it realz. LKY did just that. he wasn’t polished at all. smart successful yeah sure, but not polished.

            • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

              Lee Kuan Yew was determined, smart, stubborn, and successful. You can spin it how you want and it won’t change those facts. Tony Blair sums it up nicely. But then you probably don’t consider him polished.

            • chemrock's avatar chemrock says:

              Lance
              LKY can be an anglophile when in England.
              In Singapore during the 60s-80s, he put on a gangster persona, because he was facing tough mean people.
              Decades later when the country was ‘tamed’, folks got better educated, the hardcore segment died off or grown old, LKY’s persona change. We see a softer version.

              LKY is not perfect but there were some very strong points about him. The 2 attributes I most strongly admire –
              (1) He listens to talent, and gives credit where due. He brought in talent even from overseas.
              (2) All Singaporeans, even those who hold grudges against him for one reason or another, have no doubt at all that whatever he does, even if unpalatable policies, he had Singapore’s best interest at heart.

              • LCPL_X's avatar LCPL_X says:

                kinda like how MLKjr has famous for code switching. he’d talk to whites differently than blacks. and everyone respected him for it. read the room. know your audience. thanks.

                • LCPL_X's avatar LCPL_X says:

                  Overseas talent is most important. I remember when I wrote something about fixing the justice system by bringing in more Fil-Ams, i didn’t realized how offensive that simple idea was. but yeah sometimes you gotta leave the box and bring folks from outside it. Most A filipinos cannot comprehend DE filipinos. i don’t see any LKY anytime soon in the Philippines. even that list of youngster from Joe. wasn’t that the same kid with that Back to the Future Nike shoes?

              • i7sharp's avatar i7sharp says:

                Question:

                Which is considered the best kind of English (language)?

                ChatGPT replied:

                x-

                The concept of the “best” kind of English is subjective and context-dependent. There are several major varieties of English, each with its own standards and prestige, often influenced by historical, cultural, and socio-political factors. Here are some of the major varieties:

                British English: This is often considered the traditional standard, particularly in former British colonies and in international contexts. It includes various accents and dialects, such as Received Pronunciation (RP), which is often seen as the most prestigious accent within the UK.

                American English: Due to the global influence of the United States in media, business, technology, and education, American English is widely understood and used internationally. It includes General American (GenAm), which is often considered a neutral and widely understood accent.

                Australian English: This variety is influential in the Asia-Pacific region and has its own standards and norms.

                Canadian English: It shares many features with both British and American English, reflecting Canada’s historical ties and cultural influences.

                Indian English: Widely spoken in India, this variety has its own norms and is influenced by the diverse linguistic landscape of the country.

                Other Regional Varieties: These include but are not limited to New Zealand English, South African English, and Irish English, each with unique features.

                Standard English is often regarded as the “best” form in formal contexts, such as education, professional communication, and media. This typically refers to the standard written form and the prestigious accents within a particular region (e.g., RP in the UK, GenAm in the US).

                Ultimately, the “best” kind of English depends on the context in which it is being used. In international business, American or British English might be preferred for clarity and mutual understanding. In local contexts, the regional variety of English that aligns with the cultural and social norms of that area would be considered the best.

                -x

                • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

                  Nice work getting Bard to parse that. I ask tough questions and he flees the scene. He won’t write me a blog article in the style of Joe America. Says he is still in training for that.

          • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

            the problem with gibo is that there are other sharks too, quick to open their fat traps and apparently gives unsolicited opinions. take martires for example, he reportedly spoke out of turn and preempted gibo, saying the ayungin shoal toss up was accident. gibo then played catch up and corrected martires that the toss up was planned and deliberate attempt by the chinese at piracy on the high seas, confiscating properties that belong to the republic of the philippines like registered guns owned by armed forces, and smashing navigational equipments used by our coast guard. we want those properties returned, the damage done to our boats paid, and injured mariners paid compensation.

            so now pbbm is in quandary, too many loose mouths in his gabinete speaking on things not really in their jurisdiction and contradicting one another. fortunately for gibo, he and pbbm are of the same opinion: it was no accident.

            if martires is indeed a professional and not a marites, he’ll apologise to both the president and gibo.

            • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

              are successful people hated, I dont think so, though it appear that way. envied yes, but hated, not so. successful people are copied, admired and put on pedestal. though at close range some of them can be so damn irritating and a disappointment too. in the sense that they often cannot readily repeat their success, struggle to make headway and pitied at times. maybe they were given far too much credit.

            • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

              President Marcos yesterday corrected his remarks to align with Teodoro.

          • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

            she may not be populist but senator hontiveros is getting there. she was seen singing ‘my favorite things’ in the internet and her voice is spot on, she got it right the gap between the notes. she sang with ease too! yes, more singing please, people need to see her as well rounded sort of person, one that can relax and take things easy, aside from the person who can hit the floor running and whose bite can be lethal.

        • chemrock's avatar chemrock says:

          By that definition, Leni is a populist.

          I think the term ‘populist’ has been dragged in the mud. It should not have the the negative undertones given it.

          Populists are winning the votes all over EU. Thanks to the socialist for going too much to the extreme Left in the last 15 years or so.

          • LCPL_X's avatar LCPL_X says:

            I thought this was a funny video about George Fox who started Quakerism.

            who said:

            “Be still and cool in your own mind and spirit from your own thoughts, and then you will feel the principle of God to turn your mind to the Lord God, from whom life comes; whereby you may receive his strength and power to allay all blusterings, storms, and tempests.”
            ~ George Fox, 1624-1691

  2. arlene's avatar arlene says:

    Neither do I like populists Joeam. What can you say about those plans of the Dutertes in 2025? I say enough of a duterte face. They are insatiable.

    • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

      Yes, I compared them to a fungal rash on X. They go away . . . such relief . . . then return when they need attention.

      • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

        ttps://manilastandard.net/news/national/314464583/chiz-says-bato-can-decline-invite-to-ejk-hearing.html

        ahem, this could well be fungal infection in the making: senate president and wannabe fungal escudero presumably lawyering for fungal bato, haha, hik.

        in his capacity as senate president, escudero adviced bato he dont need to attend house inquiry. ay nanlaming ako! truly, fungal escudero could have said to fungal bato he doesnt need to attend fungal house inquiry but that fungal escudero would appreciate if fungal bato – does attend.

        you know, keeps house fungal growth to the miminum, coz if unabatted, fungi in the house could grow exponentially and create havoc to the whole environment that is the philippines.

        ay naku, it’s just talk, fungal bato can surely fungal talk his way in and out of house full of fungus much like the chinese with multiple personalities, alice gou who fronted senate inquiry. now that lady can fungal talk, left, right and center.

    • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

      ay, the duterte may have emasculated pbbm and have utter hold on him. the marcoses owed duterte humongous favor na habang buhay pagbabayaran. wasnt it duterte who made possible the internment of apo bangkay in libingan ng mga bayani, given apo bangkay a national heroes burial complete with 21 gun salutes, dignity at last! apo’s name added to the roll call of the nations top heroes, there for all to see, generations after generations, his name enshrined forever.

      pbbm who so wanted to emulate his father in both legacy and fame, cannot possibly have his father’s burial and heroism be talked and questioned about and be speculated on like it was some game of jueting. for where would that leave pbbm?

      so here he is again: pbbm harping about de lima’s acquital that our justice system does work, hence no need for ICC probe. except that de lima is not duterte and duterte is hostile witness who may very well ignore ICC let alone our courts of law.

      de lima may have been given justice, not victims of ejks though. already bato on escudero’s advice is not attending house inquiry, duterte as well. these people are seemingly above house inquiry and apparently dictating their own terms. that if justice is to be serve, house would just have to forego their inquiry. and for victims of ejks to file criminal cases anew vs duterte et al here in philippines instead of at ICC.

      and of course, pbbm would go along with that rather than oppose duterte.

  3. venturavc619's avatar venturavc619 says:

    Thank you for this most convincing article Joe. For some time now, I have indeed developed a soft spot for Sec. Teodoro. I just hope time will tell on his moral consistency.

    Virgil Ventura

  4. In olden days, all people needed was a “strong chief” to lead the tribe into battle and make sure everyone had enough to eat. The instincts we all have are Stone Age, with a thin veneer of education above it. LCPL_X might sing “baby, we ain’t nothing but mammals.”

    A Dutch anthropologist named Wolters defined the expectations of leadership in Southeast Asia with “men of prowess” after having known a Sultan somewhere in what is now Indonesia or Malaysia. The question is, how is prowess seen by different people.

    I glanced once on an article that also saw Indonesian technocrats as “men of prowess,” so it seems that they don’t see the likes of Roxas or Gibo as weak over there. Don’t know if fewer working class Indonesian women get pregnant from tricycle drivers than Filipinas do..

    ..jokes aside, but still in a culture that values competence, it is easier. Indonesian peasants are said at times to admire deceased President Habibie, the engineer who created Indonesia’s aircraft and boat industry as a “magician.” At least their magical thinking is a step further.

    Some Filipinos TODAY still see the infrastructure oligarchs are building as a Marcos Jr. legacy, reflecting the legacy of Marcos Sr., his “magic.” Hawaiians and Maori of New Zealand believe traditionally that “maná” or power of chiefs is inherited and broken only by defeat or failure.

    As the people of the Pacific have similar roots, one should not be surprised that there were attempts throughout three decades to paint the era started by Cory Aquino as a “failure.” Filipinos drop those whose fortune is seen as sinking, whether it is stars or “rulers.”

    Prof. Xiao Chua defines that Filipino mindset by way of the Visayan word gahum, aka power. MLQ3 uses the terms malakas and mahina. Malakas is someone who is perceived as someone good to hang on to (kapit) for favors. Indeed, few Filipinos see the entire nation. As of now.

    The danger in fact is that Dutertes might be seen as close to Chinese wealth, even as Marcos shows that he is close to American power. That is how it looks like at this point. Competence is seen as something one can order or hire like Aguinaldo had Heneral Luna working for him.

    Tulfo calls upon lawyers and other experts in his shows. Gothic Kings saw literate Romans as weak but useful after conquering Rome. Medieval European Kings thought the same of priests, men useful for writing, but not “real men” who fought and f..ed like they did.

    Much of the attitudes of Filipinos are those of tribal people or of Medieval peasants. Or a mix. Thus, former ministers of Kings rarely become Kings, well minister used to mean servant. Lords of the Realm aka Senators become Kings. Local barons can also become Kings.

    Don’t know if Gibo Teodoro can get to the point where he is seen as a “magician” like Dr. Habibie who built his reputation in Suharto’s time. Tulfo is a Senator and therefore by definition a potential President. So as one can see I have way more questions than answers.

    • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

      Because of the China conflict, I think Secretary Teodoro is getting “launch time” visibility. But I suspect he would poll poorly because he is just a worker, not a politician, and he’d have to launch himself in late 2027. I drafted this article about a week ago. Since then, I read that he is direct and firm in Cabinet meetings. His recent messaging “clarified” President Marcos’ statement that China made a mistake, which led to the latest confrontation. Teodoro said it was no mistake. China intended to wreak havoc. Today he said there is no basis for bilateral talks because China does not deal in good faith. This while DFA Sec Manalo says they are trying to meet with China.

      • LCPL_X's avatar LCPL_X says:

        I think if Teodoro starts channeling Lapu-Lapu in the South China seas, Joe. he will propel himself. but at most I see him again as just another VP to my beloved Inday Sara. he does have that whole Dick Gordon air to him though, same energy i think. been watching youtube videos. i hope he doesn’t have any fancy pet dogs or at least don’t feature them in some Lifestyle article. thats my only advice. but as bad cop to PBBM’s good cop, he’s filling that role perfectly. he needs to embrace it and push it further imho. I imagine Lapu-Lapu pissing towards Magellan as Magellan and his men were wading thru to talk some sense into Lapu-Lapu and surrender to Jesus and Spain and his cousin Humabun. i just saw a recent trailer of this movie called Heretic looks good. Teodoro needs to look like he’s setting up an eloborate trap. like Lapu-Lapu and Hugh Grant. he’ll need to sacrifice some Filipinos make China look aggressive. then parade their bodies like martyrs ala Gaza style. really stir up that victimhood sentiment ala Jesus cuz Filipinos love that shit.

        • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

          if gibo wants to be taken seriously, he has to channel himself and stick to his principles and his mandate. and because he appears courageous, smart and unshakable, and if people thinks he embodies the spirit of lapulapu, that is a bonus.

        • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

          Don’t overthink it, or ascribe character to people you don’t know. I have to keep telling my son that as he is inclined to judge quickly, deploying ignorance at the expense of others.

          • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

            you are a good parent, joeam.

            • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

              I was so impressed with what a motorcycle taxi driver said in an article I read yesterday. He’s put one daughter through college, reasoning that “education is something you can give that no one can take away.” So I keep shoving my lifelong learnings at my son whether he likes it or not. 😁

  5. Francis's avatar Francis says:

    “You’d prefer Duterte or Tulfo? You’d prefer Robredo? You’d prefer Hontiveros?

    Okay, tell me how they are better than Secretary Teodoro.”

    Duterte and Tulfo are populists. And you are correct that Robredo, while smart and decent, is no shark—lacks the teeth, the killing instinct for politics. But I am rather surprised that Hontiveros has not caught your eye.

    Secretary Teodoro is very talented and smart—topped his exams, has considerable post-graduate qualifications—and is considered highly qualified, often described as a “technocrat.” For instance, he has repeatedly served as Secretary for National Defense.

    But it is worth noting that he has not won a national election—his highest elected post being that of a congressman from Tarlac. And it is also worth noting that much of his reputation comes from his performance in offices that he was *appointed* to. He is a technocrat, through and through. This is not a bad thing. We need solid technocrats, qualified people to run and direct our bureaucracy. Sec. Teodoro has done an excellent job steering our defense sector as Secretary of the DND—of ensuring that the modernization of our army is implemented well and of safeguarding our nation’s sovereignty as a whole.

    However, national leadership (and the ability to push for substantial reforms) doesn’t just require talent or brains—that’s just half of what’s needed; the other half is a keen instinct for politics, for what appeals, what catches the eye, what ought to be said, what inspires. Technocrats are limited in that they mostly have the talent or brains, but not enough of the other half. Populists are flawed in that they have good political instincts—know exactly what to say—but not much else in their noggins.

    My case for Hontiveros is that she has both the talent and the keen political instinct—and that additionally, she’s the only one who can navigate (and unite) both left and right flanks of the opposition with ease given her unique background.

    With respect to talent and expertise, Hontiveros has filed many bills and ensured the passage of several laws pertaining to her advocacy for the rights of women and children. Moreover, she’s also used her position as a Senator and as Chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Women, Children, Family Relations and Gender Equality to act as a fiscalizer—spearheading several investigations wherein she has been thorough and well-prepared.

    With respect to Hontiveros’ political instincts—after repeated attempts, she has managed to get herself into national office (as Senator) and has used her position to stay close to the pulse of public discourse; the investigations she has spearheaded (Quiboloy, Alice Guo) show not only her expertise (in her thoroughness and focus on substantial issues, rather than mere soundbites and stunts unlike Tulfo) but also show her willingness to make a niche for herself in the public discourse. It is also a testament to Hontiveros’ good political instincts that she straddles an excellent position between the right and the left of the opposition, even as a self-professed feminist democratic socialist; her policy advocacies are progressive, focusing on women’s rights, gender equality and rights for LGBTQ+ and economic support for the marginalized but at the same time she has been extremely firm in defending our sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea against the incursions of China (a position that the right would be more comfortable with). This is due to her unique background, which I think sets her apart from the rest of the PH Left; she is a military widow, and at the same time has a long experience as an progressive activist (which started, if I recall correctly, in Ateneo, which probably gives her progressiveness a more moderate tone).

    Honestly, even with all this, I am not sure whether Hontiveros will be victorious 2028 as a potential presidential candidate for the broad left + liberal (anti-Marcos/anti-Duterte) opposition. But she’s probably the only one as of this moment who actually may stand a chance in 2028.

    • Francis's avatar Francis says:

      Addendum:

      Also worth citing as proof of Hontiveros’ good political instincts:

      1. In Facebook, compared to other Senators, her FB page is presently generating huge engagements. This is even when compared to some re-electionist senators, who post a lot but only garner average engagements. See: https://x.com/DeusXMachina14/status/1802887764129784270

      2. In Leni and Kiko’s Senate Slate (Team TROPA) in 2022—she was one out of three (Hontiveros, Villanueva, Escudero) who won. And the only one who could be considered genuinely of the broad left + liberal opposition.

    • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

      An excellent argument. Where Sec. Teodoro has business aptitude, Senator Hontiveros has political aptitude, of the elected, not appointed, kind. Hers is perhaps more impressive for being carried out in full public view. Secretary Teodoro heads AFP, not a small position, but it is, as you say, a technocrats job, to listen to the generals, his own capable brain, and the President, and craft a direction. Which leads me to believe he’d be an excellent President, for the ability to listen and draw intelligent lines. Senator Hontiveros has similar skills but they are rather unattached to the physical world of guns and death and generals. They are attached to lawyerly arguments. Other than Dear Alice Guo, who is tangible. Well, I’m rattling around a bit. I think Senator Hontiveros would be a fine President. She does not yet rise to the stature of Robredo for me. She doesn’t work outside as much, in disasters and places where people are. But she is more of a shark than Robredo, so maybe she’ll get there in her own way.

    • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

      I dont know how gibo can navigate this, there seems to be three of them in that marriage, haha.

      okay, seriously folks, gibo is defense secretary but anyo is national security adviser and has a say in our security, then there is lucas bersamin who is head of national maritime council and ought to know what goes on in west phil sea. so between the three of them putting their wits together, our ayungin resupply mission is being conducted. and yet, it took them roughly 12hrs to response to china’s piracy in the high seas! where a soldier of ours lost his finger. I do hope the day will not come when a filipino soldier will lost his life.

      • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

        I think the day or two of silence was spent consulting with cough cough allies so that nothing rash would occur. Still, the President could have most certainly orated sooner, in the manner to which he has become accustomed, saying nothing at all but saying it with great aplomb.

        • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

          aha, you found pbbm’s weakness, you did! you did!

          its apparent he is insecure or has no standing security order and could not cobble his security team together. standing order for when he is made numb and unable to act for whatever reason, security hierarchy can act immediately on his behalf, strictly following the standing order put in place and updated regularly. there has been many military drills and skills ought to have been finely tuned by now, the security hierarchy conversant of come what may.

          sure, he is not in the business of making war, but should not paralyze us.

          we are a sovereign nation and we should have already communicated to our allies where we stand; our allies may give feedback.

    • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

      maybe trillanes wants to join pbbm’s team as he seems to be sending feelers as such, if so he doesnt need to drag his dating kapartido.

      • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

        https://www.rappler.com/philippines/partido-federal-pilipinas-alliance-national-unity-party/

        pbbm’s uniteam is history and now pbbm has snared another ‘unity’.

        • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

          Ho ho ho. They share “ideologies”, as do robbers, murderers, and opportunists. Forgive my cynicism. They could have recited those ideologies, but did not. Winning elections is an ideology I suppose.

      • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

        Sonny Trillanes is about as independent as they come, the pauper of modern politics, in it to do good. And get elected, of course. He has good ideas and bad ideas, like most people, and will not wail or weep if sloshed with pails of cold water. That’s my guess.

        • kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

          good guess anyway, I hear trillanes is thinking of running as mayor of caloocan this coming election. if so, I hope he has new tricks up his sleeve and out perform and outshine populist candidates. he is still young and dexterous, and has the looks to go the distance. fund might be problematic for him, so he would have to make it count all those little things that make him memorable and electable. and donations will follow.

  6. kasambahay's avatar kasambahay says:

    10 days and counting, and still pbbm has not appointed a new education secretary, too hard basket and harder than he thought. por bida, he is bogged down apparently. decision paralyses, dont know who to appoint and cannot ask help from his chief of staff!

    double por bida! he wants an education secretary that can lift up the dismal scores of our students at pisa. that person probly does not exist! but in the meantime, he ought to blot out the names of candidates and concentrate on their qualifications, real qualifications, not fakes ones. and chose one who he thinks has best potential. surely, it’s not rocket science!

    • JoeAm's avatar JoeAm says:

      It’s not rocket science. Leni Robredo would be superb. Energize youth. But politics makes it impossible. Humans still run in packs.

Leave a comment