The Car Is Not the Enemy. Disorder Is.
By Karl Garcia In the Philippines, transport debates play out like moral crusades. Cars are the devil. Public transit is holiness. Bikes promise redemption. But as the Department of Transportation (DoTr) opens bids for a 2055 Transportation System Master Plan—drawing five global consortia competing for $44 million in Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank funding—it’s time to … Continue reading
Position Paper: The Philippine Capital Debate — Why Tri-Capital May Be the Most Realistic Outcome
By Karl Garcia I. Executive Summary The debate over relocating the Philippine capital is often framed as a simple choice between Manila, Clark, Aurora, or Quezon. However, capital relocation is not primarily an infrastructure issue. It is a question of statecraft, national identity, and institutional design. The Philippines’ political reality—strong regional elites, competing visions of … Continue reading
Do Not Go Gentle Into Performative Governance
Why the Philippines Needs Proof, Not Applause By Karl Garcia The Philippines is not a poor country. It is a tired one. Tired of traffic that steals years from our lives.Tired of institutions that promise reform and deliver excuses.Tired of elections that feel consequential—and governance that does not. And so, little by little, we have … Continue reading
The Philippines’ Hydra Problem: Why We Keep Fighting the Same Wars
By Karl Garcia The Philippines does not suffer from a single dominant crisis. It is trapped in a self-reinforcing system of failure—a governance hydra where every problem we cut down regenerates in another form. Crime. Human rights abuses. Weak innovation. Environmental collapse. Debt anxiety. Policy reversals. Electoral volatility. Institutional decay. Military politicization. Privatization without accountability. … Continue reading
When Power Becomes Performance: Why Governance by Shock Fails Democracies
By Karl Garcia In different political systems and cultures, Donald Trump and Rodrigo Duterte practiced a similar style of leadership: governance by shock, confrontation, and personal dominance. Their supporters often praised this approach as “strong leadership” or a necessary disruption of elite complacency. Yet with the benefit of distance and evidence, it is increasingly clear … Continue reading